Fields of Mistria animals
This farm animal surface joins the 8 captured animal records with 22 related animal-product records. It answers the first ranching lookup while keeping care schedules and production timing outside the captured promise. Animals remains bound to the v1.0.2 capture.
Steam 1.0 release ·Animals source boundary
Start this animals check with the displayed count, then keep the chosen field and source link together when the answer affects a longer route.
Animals lookup
30 records shown · v1.0.2
30 records shown · Name A–Z
No records match this lookup.
The animal surface combines 8 captured animal identities with 22 animal-product records, but it keeps the two families distinguishable in every result. Search a creature or output name, then use category, captured value, tags, or source text to narrow the combined set. This supports questions such as whether a remembered name belongs to an animal, a sellable product, or a broader material record. A product row does not by itself prove which individual animal produced it, how often production occurs, or which care condition applies. Likewise, an animal identity row does not inherit every value from products that appear nearby in the search. The result count describes the active query, and the source link provides the page-level context behind the compact record. Use category before value when the family matters, then inspect the missing fields honestly. The lookup supplies a reliable first separation between animals and outputs without inventing housing schedules, affection thresholds, product frequency, or purchase advice outside the captured boundary.
What this lookup covers
Animal rows retain their category, page id, revision, and source link. Product rows add source text, sell value, tags, and the captured animal-product category. The combined lookup makes it possible to search “wool” or “milk” without pretending that every animal has a complete production schedule. Filter values come from the two real record families, and missing care, season, or schedule fields remain “Not captured”. The table therefore answers what the capture names and values, while leaving room for a later source update to add care frequency or housing detail without rewriting today’s records. The two families are joined for search convenience but retain different meanings. An animal identity is not the same thing as an output, and a product row does not establish which creature produced it or how often it appears. The category and source fields preserve that distinction for later checking. This section keeps the 30 animals records inside the v1.0.2 capture separate from later research.
Animal identity rows retain their name, category, page id, revision marker, and source relationship. Product rows can additionally carry source text, captured sell value, tags, version information, and the animal-product category. The page joins them for search convenience but does not erase the difference in meaning. Empty care, season, housing, or schedule fields remain not captured because those details were not available as shared structured values. Sorting a product value does not rank animals, and matching a tag does not establish a production rule. The route links to farming and items because ranching sits beside crop work and material use, yet those pages keep their own evidence and cannot fill a missing animal field automatically. When a purchase or care decision depends on frequency, affection, feed, weather, or housing, open the source record that names the animal or product. The compact lookup should identify the right evidence family before a player relies on a more detailed claim.
Version boundary
Search the product name when you are looking for a sellable output, or filter the category field to separate animals from products. Use source links for page-specific care details. The route connects back to Farming for the crop side of a day and to Items for material records without adding a database or unsupported planner. For a balanced farm check, read an animal row and its product row together, then confirm the source page if the missing field would change a purchase or care decision. A good ranching lookup starts with the output when the task is economic, and with the animal when the task is care. Keep the category filter visible as you search, then open the source for any decision involving housing, affection, timing, or a relationship between a product and its producer. Use the animals result as a documented next step, then revisit the linked source if a later version changes the field.
All animal and product records are presented under the displayed v1.0.2 capture context. This boundary keeps a current community revision distinct from later patches, new products, balance changes, or corrected page relationships. Stable record ids and source links make a future comparison possible without pretending that the earlier value was timeless. For a practical farm check, search the output, confirm whether the result is an animal or product row, read the value and source fields that are actually present, and verify any missing care detail at the linked page. Official release announcements can explain when a ranching system changed, but they do not automatically update each structured product record. The page does not connect to a save file and does not store animal state. Its filters are local reading tools. A later source-bound capture is the proper way to change the dataset, preserving the evidence behind today’s result while allowing the almanac to adopt a verified revision. Keep the product category visible when copying a result into a farm note. That small context prevents an output name from being misread later as an animal identity or a complete care instruction. When comparing captured values, confirm that both rows describe products before drawing an economic conclusion. Mixing an identity row with an output row creates a comparison the source never intended, even when both appear under the same ranching search.